The following is my rebuttal to some comments made about the article Will the Mormons Please Excommunicate Harry Reid Already June 7, 2006 at ldspatriot.wordpress.com
Harry Reid is a despicable human being and should not be allowed to stand within the ranks of the Elders of Israel.
Frankly, I find it hard to believe that he does.
Captain Moroni would have slain, or caused to be put to death, Harry along with the rest of the criminals in congress!
Who the hell are you John? Pull your head out of your ass!! Read some Ezra Taft Benson and re-read Alma 46 and 62.
President Benson, in his book "An Enemy Hath Done This", warned of three types of internal enemies to our free republic:
1. "Well-meaning but uninformed people who see the shortcomings of our economic system and believe they can legislate them out of existence."
2. "Self seeking men who see in government legislation a way to obtain special privileges for themselves or to restrain their competitors."
3. "a smaller group is dedicated to the overthrow of the economic and social system that is our tradition."
So, I ask you: Which category does dirty Harry fall into?
Personally I think he is mostly category 1, but somewhat category 2 as well. But, his actions also aid and abet those in category 3.
Harry Reid is an enemy to The United Sates of America and to free men and lovers of liberty everywhere. He is an embarassment and a disgrace to members of the church of Christ. His actions are far worse than one excommunicated on grounds of adultery, and therefore should be excommunicated.
As far as John's request that those of us who see the light stop attacking Reid for doing what he "thinks" is right. This is an absurd request. If what he thinks is right is actually wrong, then we have an obligation to oppose him and defend what is actually right.
By the way, why does the tired battle between Republicans and Democrats have to be drug into this? Forget party affiliation. This is about right and wrong; good and evil; principles founded on truth and those founded on falsehood and deceit. Besides it can hardly be said that either party resembles what they once were or what they stood for. A party affiliation is merely a political means to an end. Its absurd to think that all people could be divided and lumped into two categories. However, that being said, one can argue with sufficient historical proof that one party has been a better steward of the promotion and defense of individual inalienable rights of man.
